But if it were to be true, then Harry Potter was not in a position to relax after the Battle of Hogwarts…īecause he had an entire life of forced immortality ahead of him, and his long-anticipated reunion with the loved ones he’d lost was not meant to ever happen. While it’s wild speculation, this theory kind of explains Harry’s luck earlier in the series: he survived multiple threats simply because it was impossible for him to die from anything but Voldemort’s hand. This only strengthens the sneaky suspicion that Harry Potter could not physically die. The scene where Harry “died” and came back to life only adds more questions since Voldemort did actually kill a part of his own soul, the Horcrux that’s been sitting in Harry’s body for many years, but the spell didn’t kill the boy himself. This raises a logical assumption that since Voldemort was destroyed completely, Harry accidentally became immortal: if he could only die by Voldemort’s hand and there was no more Voldemort, there was nothing else that could end Harry’s life. If you just want to button mash and swing and roll, you can and it will seem lame. I wouldn't say its the best or worst, but really is more what you make of it. It definitely isn't the best combat mechanics I've seen. The first part, however, makes a peculiar implication as it states that both (as “either” can be read in such a meaning, too) of them must only die at each other’s hand. Combat is most certainly not the most polished, though I wouldn't call it terrible. The second part is self-explanatory: either Harry or Voldemort must die. “Either must die at the hand of the other, for neither can live while the other survives,” claimed the prophecy.

Upon learning about the prophecy, both the characters and the readers were thrilled with its sudden implications - but while everyone was focused on the second part of the last phrase, no one really paid attention to what the first one suggested.

Witcher 3 wild at heart terrible